After the Being White in Philly article came out in the PhillyMag, there was a lot of controversy in Philly.
Many Blacks and White elites wanted to shut down the racial concerns of Whites, as they always have.
The Squids want Whites to shut up, and put up with their social engineering. There is no "brotherly love" here in Philadelphia, only the desire of elite Whites to use their praetorian Black guard to prevent the formation of potential challengers to their political power by non-elite Whites. Some things never change, we need new a Magna Carta.
Here are the SquidSponses to "Being White in Philly"
PhillySquid A: Michael Coard (Jar-Jar Binks?)
"Philly Mag’s “Being White in Philly” Is Really Being Wrong in Philly: I grew up four blocks from 19th and Diamond, and I’m not dangerous"
Seems both Blacks and Squids have true problems with statistics, suits their housing pump and dump strategies well anyhow. You have the Blacks to not know math, and the Squids to pretend they don't.
Check out this gem:
"Well, goddamn it, slavery, sharecropping, convict leasing, Jim Crow, and de facto discrimination are this country’s Dr. Frankenstein. And the violent black criminals and the lazy, shiftless young black men that Huber seems fixated upon are the creations. If you disagree, then there’s only one other explanation: Black folks are genetically predisposed to be violent, to be criminal, and to be lazy and shiftless. It’s either nature or (forcibly imposed)nurture.
There’s a right answer and a white answer. Take your pick"
Liberal Creationism is the only answer, Hallelujah!
Philly Squid B: Jason Fagone (There is something in common in these features? "Aquatic" perhaps? )
"Philly Mag’s “Being White in Philly” Doesn’t Make Sense as Journalism How do you launch a frank discussion about race under a cloak of anonymity?"
"Fagone" goes on to spout drivel about how everyone should be able to speak their mind on race without "the cloak of anonymity. How will Frodo ever bring the ring to Mordor and destroy it, inquiring minds want to know?
In other words, lets make the first steps towards taking away internet privacy and free speech. Good idea squids!!! Then nobody can oppose you.
Finally, you have the biggest NutSquid of them all:
PhillySquid #1: Mayor Nutter (No nickname needed)
"Mayor Nutter Threatens Magazine with Criminal Charges for “White in Philly” Story"
Check out this Speech-inking Squids
"Letter to the Philadelphia Human Relations Commision".
This is ink squirted out in panic by the NutSquid himself, a must read.
Here are some inky quotes:
"While I fully recognize that constitutional protections afforded the press are intended to protect the media from censorship by the government, the First Amendment, like other constitutional rights, is not an unfettered right, and notwithstanding the First Amendment, a publisher has a duty to the public to exercise its role in a responsible way. I ask the Commission to evaluate whether the "speech" employed in this essay is not the reckless equivalent of "shouting 'fire!' in a crowded theater," its prejudiced, fact-challenged generalizations an incitement to extreme reaction."
Quite an ink cloud eh?
Story on the Reason.com Blog
(IT GIVES THEM AWAY)